A clear source trail
Religious articles must identify their Qur’an references, Hadith sources and grading where relevant, and the scholarly works supporting their explanations. A link alone is not verification.
Words in their proper place
Arabic Qur’an, an identified English translation, Hadith, supplication and editorial explanation are presented as distinct kinds of content. Editorial explanations are never labelled as revelation or tafsir.
Differences deserve clarity
Where recognised scholarly positions differ, we explain the material differences. Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i and Hanbali positions are identified where relevant; disputed matters must not be described as unanimous.
Real review, recorded
Religious content must pass source verification and scholarly review before publication. Published articles identify their reviewer, review date and references. Changes to the text require renewed approval.
Historical evidence has different strengths
Qur’anic evidence, authentic Hadith, early historical reports and later tradition must be identified separately. They are not treated as equally reliable.
Corrections
Material source or review concerns require the affected article to be withdrawn while they are investigated. We preserve the revision history and repeat the relevant checks before republishing.